Articles Posted in New York

Published on:

by

This is a case of appeal being heard in the Second Department, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the state of New York. The appellant in the matter is Charles O. Sharkey. The respondents in the matter are the Police Department of the town of South Hampton, et al.

The petitioner is appealing a decision that was made by the Supreme Court of Suffolk County on the 18th of December, 1989. The Suffolk County Supreme Court dismissed the case, which was a review of a determination that was made by the Police Department in the town of South Hampton. The Police Department had terminated the petitioner’s employment after he pleads guilty to the misdemeanor charge of driving while intoxicated.

Case Background and Discussion

Continue reading

Published on:

by

This case deals with the Plaintiff/Claiming Authority, Christine Malafi, who is the County Attorney for Suffolk County. The defendants in the matter are Edward J. Radwinsky and the Ford Motor Credit Company. The case is being heard in the Supreme Court of the State of New York that is located in Suffolk County.

Case Background

On the 19th of December, 2004, the defendant was arrested for operating the subject Ford while he was intoxicated (DWI). He was driving in the eastbound lane of the service road on the Long Island Expressway in the city of Hauppauge, New York. The defendant was given a breathalyzer test after being taken into custody. The breathalyzer showed that his blood alcohol level was 0.19%, which is above the legal limit. This resulted in the defendant being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.

Continue reading

by
Posted in: and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

This case is being heard in the First District Court of Suffolk County. The plaintiff in the case is the People of the State of New York. The defendant of the case is Jose R. Rivas. Judge M. Filiberto is overseeing the proceeding.

There has been a combined Probable Cause, Huntley, and Refusal Hearing in this matter. The Court has found the following facts in the case.

Case Facts

Continue reading

by
Posted in: , and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

The case involves the petitioner, U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance, Inc. The respondents in the matter are Abraham A. Rubashkin, Joseph Rubashkin, Rivka Rubashkin, Rosie Sandman, Gutol Leiter, Hilgar Limited, 452-53rd Street Reality Company, A.A. Rubashkin & Sons Inc. 410 East 17th Street, LLC, 404 Realty Associates, LLC, and John Doe’s numbered one through ten.

The case is being heard in the Supreme Court of the State of New York located in Kings County. Judge Arthur M. Schack is hearing the case.

Case Background

Continue reading

by
Posted in: , and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

Bilingual detectives are an advantage to any police department. The problems that they solve cross boundaries that have existed for many years. However, problems can also arise that are exclusive to a bilingual undercover investigation. A New York DWI Lawyer said one such case occurred in 1983, when a bilingual detective named Ramos worked for the New York City Police Department. He had been a detective for more than fifteen years at the time of this particular trial. He was assigned to work on the Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force. The objective of this task force was to apprehend persons who were primarily dealers of drugs at a level that is above the street level dealer who does hand to hand sales for five or ten dollars each. The goal was to apprehend the dealers who supply the street level dealer.

On July 16, 1981, Ramos contacted a dealer and told him that he wanted to purchase a large amount of drugs. Ramos had been assigned to a particular area and had worked for months to infiltrate the drug scene in that area. The street level dealer told Ramos that he had a contact that could supply the cocaine that Ramos had indicated that he was interested in purchasing. A A New York DWI Lawyer said the street level dealer contacted Ramos and with him present, called the upper level dealer. Ramos testified at trial that he told Ramos that the street level dealer had informed him that Ramos was a reliable person and that he had the product that Ramos wanted to purchase.

Several attempts to meet past by because one or the other was not able to make the meeting. When a meeting was finally arranged, the upper level dealer explained to Ramos in Spanish that he would be meeting him and gave him a description of his clothing and the type of vehicle that he would be in. Ramos advised him that he would be driving a red truck. When the meeting occurred, an Hispanic man approached Ramos and Ramos invited him to sit in the truck to talk. Ramos had a back up officer with him for the meeting. The two discussed an on-going criminal relationship of purchasing large amounts of cocaine. The upper level dealer advised him that he would be able to purchase one pound of cocaine for $29,000. However, he stated that he would first have to purchase a smaller amount so that he could see that Ramos was not an undercover police officer. The smaller purchase was made and the two made arrangements to meet the following day to conduct the larger purchase.

Continue reading

by
Posted in: , and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

The plaintiff in this case is Julius Bailey. The defendants in the matter are the Suffolk County Police Department and the Suffolk County Legal Department. The case is being heard in the District Court of Suffolk County in the state of New York. Judge C. Stephen Hackeling is overhearing the case.

A New York Criminal Lawyer said the plaintiff is seeking to recover $1,492 for damages sustained to his vehicle while it was in the custody of the defendant, the County. The County has placed an application through the court to have the complaint against them dismissed. This application has been deferred and will be decided along with the small claims action of the case.

Case Facts

Continue reading

Published on:

by

This matter deals with the respondent, Philip S. Lapenta, who is an attorney. The petitioner in the matters is the Grievance Committee fro the Tenth Judicial District. The case is being heard in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department, Appellate Division.

Case Background

A New York Criminal Lawyer said the respondent was admitted to the bar on the 21st of February, 1973. On the 19th of March, 2008, the Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee served the respondent with a verified petition that contained four charges of misconduct.

Continue reading

Published on:

by

The People of the State of New York are the plaintiffs in this case. The defendant in the case is Patricio R. Herrera. The case is being heard in the Suffolk County District Court. Judge Salvatore A. Alamia is presiding over the case.

A New York DWI Lawyer said the defendant in this case has been charged with driving while intoxicated and failing to maintain a lane. A Dunaway, Mapp, Huntley, and Refusal hearing has been held in the case to determine which evidence in the case will be admissible during trial. The plaintiff and the defendant have been given time to submit written closing statements. Both sides have provided these statements to the court.

Case Facts

Continue reading

by
Posted in: , and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

The plaintiff in this case is the People of the State of New York. The defendant of the case is John McAleavey. The case is being heard in the Trial Term Part VI of the Suffolk County Court. Judge Stuart Namm is presiding over the case.

The defendant has been charged with two counts of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (DWI).

Case Facts

Continue reading

by
Posted in: and
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

by

The plaintiff’s of the case are the People of the State of New York. Kendrick Roopnarine is the defendant of the case. The District Court of Nassau County is where the case is being heard, with Judge Kenneth L. Gartner overseeing the proceeding.

The defendant of the case, Kendrick Roopnarine has been charged with two counts of driving while intoxicated (DWI) as well as three traffic infractions that were committed at the same place during the same time. All of the charges were calendared to be heard in the Nassau County Court. An administrative error resulted in the traffic infractions also being calendared in the Traffic and Parking Violations Agency of Nassau County. The defendant has plea-bargained with the Traffic and Parking Violations agency for a resolution regarding the traffic violations. He is now seeking to have the criminal charges of the case dismissed on the grounds of double jeopardy.

Defendant Argument

Continue reading

by
Posted in: and
Published on:
Updated:
Contact Information